Challenging the Tradition of Depreciation for IT Ownership
by David Merrill on Dec 6, 2012
In my last few blogs, I discussed options to reduce costs, and how at certain points in time (right now for more and more clients), challenging and changing the IT ownership paradigm is one of the best ways to reduce both OPEX and CAPEX within the storage/IT department.
Let’s back up and talk about depreciation first. Depreciating IT assets was the preferred method to acquire IT assets in the past. IT assets used to be (and still are) very expensive, so from an annual report basis, capturing these long-term assets was best done with depreciation. When you spend millions on a solution, accountants want to sweat the asset and get every cent of value out of it (over time). With new innovations and advancements, keeping assets for 4, 5 and even 7 years does not always make the best business sense. Innovation with new technology is stifled. Flexibility to adopt new options to capture market share or revenue is limited. Depreciation makes sense from an accounting point of view, but not always from an IT agility point of view.
In the U.S., the government has sometimes initiated new depreciation options in the tax code to incentivize businesses to make large capital purchases. This worked rather well in 2003 with the Jobs Growth Act (JGTRRA) that also had a provision to shorten capital depreciation terms. This tax change was extended past 2010, and is set to expire at the end of this month. These expiring laws are at the heart of the ‘fiscal cliff’ that is mentioned so much in the news this week.
Anyway, depreciation with normal terms or accelerated terms is a process that is on its way out. There will be new methods to own and consume IT assets. This table is a short list and summary. I will spend more time in future postings talking about each one in more detail.
|
Managed Service Solutions (MSS) |
Infrastructure on Demand (IoD) |
Outsourcing |
Public Cloud |
|
| Description |
SLA-based, full managed service |
Lease-based infrastructure |
Vendor purchases & operates IT infrastructure |
Services or infrastructure are off-site, access via the internet |
| Also known as |
Private Cloud Out-tasked platform |
Step-Lease |
Off-shoring |
Cloud Service |
| Asset ownership |
Vendor |
Client |
Client or Vendor |
Vendor |
| Asset Location |
Local |
Local |
Both remote and local |
Remote |
| Service level agreement (SLA) ownership |
Vendor |
Client |
Vendor |
Vendor |
| Flex up and down |
Flex Up and down |
Mostly flex up |
Up only |
Up and down |
| Expenditure Model |
OPEX |
CAPEX |
OPEX |
OPEX |
| Minimum commitment |
500TB |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
| Contract Duration |
5 -7 years |
3-5 years |
5-10 years |
Subscription |
| Migration and Transformation costs |
Vendor |
Client |
Vendor |
Client |
| Technology Refresh |
Included |
Not Included |
Depends |
Included |
| Management Staff |
Vendor |
Client |
Vendor |
Vendor |
| Staff location |
Remote |
Local |
Both Remote and Local |
Remote |
| Environmental costs |
Client |
Client |
Vendor |
Client |
These 4 column summaries are not all-inclusive, there are many variations available right now. The bottom line is that the traditional purchase-depreciate-asset retire/disposition model is likely to be replaced in the future. These new options provide flexibility, but they can also have an impact to help reduce costs right now.



