Archive for July, 2006
32…. and counting
Posted in Storage Economics, Uncategorized on July 25th, 2006 1 Comment »
No, I am not talking about my age. A few weeks ago I wrote about the 30 types of ‘things’ that make up the total cost of storage ownership. Anil Gupta commented on my blog and made some good points, in addition to providing a good graphic on how to characterize these costs. The point [...]
Performance enhancing…….. software?
Posted in Storage Economics on July 24th, 2006 No Comments »
I am working on a new case study, it should be published in about a month, on the economic impact of not buying software to help with performance bottlenecks and analysis. Over the past few months, with spirited 11th hour price negotiations (aka lowest price-per-MB) by procurement, vendors and storage managers tends to make ‘things’ [...]
30 types of Storage Ownership Costs
Posted in Storage Economics on July 13th, 2006 2 Comments »
I realized in my last BLOG that I reference the 30 types of storage TCO elements. You can find this information in my Storage Economics white paper, but for openness sake, here is a list of the 30. Remember that Price does not equal Cost, use some of the 30 types of storage costs (or [...]
Perpendicularities
Posted in Storage Software on July 11th, 2006 1 Comment »
I had a series of discussions with colleagues in Germany last week about disk densities, price erosion and how much longer price declines will continue. Price decline is due in part to:
German Economics
Posted in Storage Economics on July 7th, 2006 1 Comment »
6 weeks ago I was in Russia, and wrote about Russian economics and the impact on the storage world there. I find myself in Germany this week, and some notes are worth mentioning.
TCO reports are getting better…
Posted in Storage Economics, Uncategorized on July 3rd, 2006 No Comments »
I came across this ITCentrix paper on the TCO of various archive techniques and products. Although a good start, I would have added more cost categories to see if the TCO separation became even greater between alternative solutions. I would have added several more cost factors in the TCO, such as:



